Representative Rick West

R

District 3

Hi, I'm Rick West and I represent the people of Oklahoma's 3rd District.


representative

News & Announcements

Sep 17, 2026
Recent Posts

Reps. Grego, Rick West Concerned over Mental Health Resignation Letters

OKLAHOMA CITY – Reps. Jim Grego, R-Wilburton, and Rick West, R-Heavener, on Thursday sent letters to the governor and Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services (ODMHSAS) Commissioner Joshua Anderson expressing concern over a fill-in-the-blank resignation email state employees said they received from the department. "As legislators representing constituents who are employees being impacted by the recent privatization of four state Behavioral Health Clinics, we write to share the concerns that have been brought to our attention by the employees," the lawmakers wrote. "These employees have already faced a significant amount of uncertainty as they navigate this transition and make important decisions regarding their employment, benefits, and their families' futures. Many have relied upon assurances regarding continued employment and the manner in which the transition would be handled."  Grego and West said they received copies of a recent "resignation email" sent to employees who live in their House districts. The email contains ODMHSAS letterhead the commissioner's name, but then leaves the date and the recipient information lines blank. It reads, "Please accept this letter as formal notification that I am resigning from my position as ____ at _____. My last day of employment will be ____. Sincerely ____." Grego and West said they are concerned that employees across the state have received similar emails, which they have created considerable confusion and concern. "Employees are questioning whether they are now being required to resign from state employment as part of this transition and, if so, what effect a resignation could have on any compensation, benefits, leave balances, retirement considerations or other transition package they were previously told they would receive," they wrote. Grego and West said this letter comes after the privatization of community mental health facilities, including one in McAlester, OK, which serves 10 counties in Southeast Oklahoma. There are other areas of the state impacted by this as well. Grego and West said they are concerned by reports from employees who feel the language of the communication is inconsistent with what they previously understood regarding the transition. Some are concerned they are effectively being subjected to a reduction in force, despite having previously been assured this would not be the case. "The employees deserve clear and accurate information before being asked to sign, acknowledge, or submit anything that could potentially affect their employment status or benefits," they wrote. They asked the commissioner for clarification regarding the intent and effect of the recent resignation communication. Specifically, they want him to clarify whether affected employees are being required to resign from ODMHSAS; whether doing so changes their eligibility for benefits, compensation, leave, retirement considerations, or transition assistance previously communicated to them; and whether any aspect of the employment transition has changed from what employees were originally told. "These individuals have dedicated themselves to serving some of Oklahoma's most vulnerable citizens," Grego and West wrote. "Their lives and livelihoods are understandably in a period of considerable upheaval, and uncertainty surrounding their employment status only adds to that burden." A copy of their full letter can be read here . 

Jul 7, 2026
Recent Posts

Gann Files 12th Appeal, New Request at OK Supreme Court in Continued Fight Against Utility Bill Increases

OKLAHOMA CITY – Two new filings at the Oklahoma Supreme Court by Rep. Tom Gann, R-Inola, continue his fight against billions of dollars of utility bill increases approved by the Oklahoma Corporation Commission (OCC) that the representative believes are unlawful. The June 30 and July 6 filings include a twelfth appeal and a request that the Court pause enforcement of a recent decision pending “further review at the federal level.” Gann has been joined in other filings by Reps. , Kevin West, R-Moore, and Rick West, R-Heavener. The newest appeal challenges a June 5, 2026, OCC ruling that denied the intervention of Gann and more than 300 customers trying to participate in the latest rate case for Public Service Company of Oklahoma (PSO). The utility is seeking a $600 million rate increase, or an additional $25 per month for the average residential customer. Gann is joined in this appeal by Michael Ritze, a former Republican state representative from Broken Arrow. The OCC, PSO and attorney general have 20 days to respond. Multiple settlement agreements have been announced since Gann’s appeal was filed, though none are unanimous, and the attorney general recently withdrew from one of them.  “For the OCC to proceed without jurisdiction is a waste of taxpayer dollars,” Gann wrote in a public comment recently filed in the PSO rate case. According to the motion, Gann “respectfully requests the Court suspend [its decision] until expiration of the time to file a petition for writ of certiorari or notice of final disposition by the United States Supreme Court,” or late September at the earliest. Many of the PSO customers trying to intervene in its rate case are members of the Stop the Inola Smelter citizens group opposed to existing customers being forced to subsidize electricity for the controversial proposed aluminum smelter. The rate case will determine terms and conditions for a new “large-load” rate class of PSO customers likely to include data centers, and possibly the smelter.  Gann and Kevin West appealed a similar OCC ruling that denied Gann’s intervention in the latest rate case for Oklahoma Natural Gas Company (ONG) on June 11. ONG is seeking a $29 million rate increase that, if approved, would mark the fourth rate hike the OCC has approved for ONG in the last four years, increasing customer bills by more than $128 million. In both rate cases, the OCC set a deadline to intervene, but the utilities’ customers were not even notified about the case until after that deadline had already passed. And when customers were notified, the appeals argue, they were only told how to give public comment, not that they have a right to participate as parties of record in the case, which permits seeing all the evidence, filing objections and cross-examining witnesses. “These cases were rigged from the start to keep utility customers out,” Kevin West said. “The federal courts have said utility customers have constitutional due process rights, including a right to timely and adequate notice about these cases. We are asking the Supreme Court to uphold customers’ rights and require the OCC to change its rules to respect them.” Unlike ONG’s rate case, which the OCC suspended pending the outcome of the Supreme Court appeal, the proceedings in PSO’s rate case have continued unabated without any discussion that the OCC may have lost jurisdiction of the case. With this latest appeal , Gann, West and West have now challenged some $500 million in rate increases, $3.2 billion in 2021 Winter Storm bonds, $11 billion in fuel charges, and $1.3 billion in new capacity preapprovals hitting the utility bills of millions of ONG, PSO and OG&E customers. Seven of those appeals are now fully briefed and under consideration by the Supreme Court. In an April 21, 2026, decision , the Court denied the first appeal of an earlier PSO rate case challenging $250 million in rate increases and $700 million of 2021 Winter Storm bonds. The Court’s opinion said Gann should have intervened in the rate case at the OCC first. On June 29, the Court declined to consider Gann’s motion to reconsider that decision. It had informed the Court that Gann and other PSO customers did not even receive notice of the rate case until after the deadline to intervene. As a result of its two rulings on procedural technicalities, the Supreme Court has not actually decided any of Gann, West and West’s legal issues. These include what they say are unlawful OCC utility “audits,” the failure to give customers timely notice of utility cases, and Commissioner Todd Hiett casting the deciding vote despite allegations of criminal conduct involving PSO’s attorneys. Gann said these required Hiett to disqualify himself from such cases under State Ethics Rules. “We are not giving up this fight,” Rick West said. “We will continue to stand up for the law and the Constitution where the OCC and attorney general have failed. It is just a question of where, how and when.” All filings in the utility case appeals are available on the Oklahoma Supreme Court website: PSO rate case ($250m rate increases; $700m bonds; decision 4/21/2026; rehearing denied 6/29/2026):     https://oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=122861 ONG, PSO & OG&E CY2023 fuel cases ($1.5 billion; all briefs filed):     https://oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=122991 OG&E rate case ($127m rate increase; $760m bonds; all briefs filed):     https://oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=123021 ONG rate case ($98m rate increases; $1.3 billion bonds; all briefs filed):     https://oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=123348 ONG 2024 fuel case ($390 million + $888m for 2021/2022; all briefs filed):     https://oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=123588 OG&E 2024 fuel case ($925 million + $1.9 billion for 2021/2022; first brief filed):     https://oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=123608 PSO 2024 fuel case ($600 million + $2.8 billion for 2021/2022; briefs this fall):     https://oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=123905 PSO Pre-Approval case ($1.255 billion; briefs this winter)    https://oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=124090 ONG Intervention Denial ($29 million rate increase)    https://oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=124164 PSO Intervention Denial ($600 million rate increase)     https://oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=124187

May 14, 2026
Recent Posts

Rep. Rick West Comments on Historic Weapons' Law

OKLAHOMA CITY – A new state law prohibits law enforcement agencies from destroying weapons considered to have historic military value. The entities instead are to donate the weapons to local units of veterans' organizations that are incorporated by enactment of the Congress of the United States. Rep. Rick West, R-Heavener, is the author of House Bill 1185 . "These weapons tell an important part of our military history and those who've served our nation," West said. "Our veterans organizations use these weapons for honor guard salutes at veterans' funerals, at other memorial ceremonies and historic reenactments. At the very least, these weapons can be used for their parts as older weapons go out of service."   West said the bill was requested by Bob Nichelson, vice commander of the Leflore County Disabled American Veterans Chapter 63 in Poteau.  West said it was particularly appropriate to recognize this bill being signed into law as veterans and active members of the military were recognized in a Joint Session of the Legislature on May 14. Sen. Micheal Bergstrom, R-Adair, is the Senate author of the bill. “This new law ensures that historic, valuable military weapons are preserved and made available to veterans’ organizations rather than being destroyed,” Bergstrom said. “I look forward to seeing this bill become law to support our veterans’ groups and the important work they do on behalf of those who have served our nation.”  The act will become effective 90 days after this year's sine die adjournment of the Legislature.